case when law is silent Things To Know Before You Buy
case when law is silent Things To Know Before You Buy
Blog Article
Given that the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been achieved, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) from the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
The main objectives of police should be to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and earlier mentioned all make sure legislation and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more
10 . Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair for the offender along with the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts However they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
The ruling of your first court created case regulation that must be followed by other courts until finally or Until both new regulation is created, or simply a higher court rules differently.
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based within the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued on the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement in the FIR lodged by FIA and inside the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
As being the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been achieved, therefore the decision on the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of your Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airlines Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted within a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. twenty/2011, this does not automatically bring about exoneration from departmental charges based on the same factual grounds. Whilst a writ under Article 199 is out there in specific limited situations, it really is generally not the right remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full opportunity to cross-take a look at witnesses and present his/her defense but did not persuade the department of his/her innocence.
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the law when it is actually unclear how it relates to any given situation, typically rendering judgments based over the intent of lawmakers and the circumstances of your case at hand. These kinds of decisions become a guide for future similar cases.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming towards the main case, Additionally it is a properly-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings around the evidence.
The legislation of necessity regarded and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it absolutely was the illegal action called law of necessity..
This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions would be the opinions that are filed about the working day that the appellate court issues its decision and in many cases are not the court's final opinion.
Statutory laws are These created by legislative bodies, for example Congress at both the federal and state levels. While this kind of legislation strives to condition our society, providing rules and guidelines, it would be unattainable for almost any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the opportunity to review both the precedent plus the case under appeal, Potentially overruling the previous case legislation by setting a fresh precedent of higher authority. This may transpire several times since the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first of the High Court of Justice, later on the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his enhancement on the concept of estoppel starting in the High Trees case.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, it is also a very well-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public website servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is subject matter to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.